Saturday 31 March 2018

When Science Loses To Emotion : Hinckley Point Nuclear Plant Sediment Is Coming To Cardiff


Hello there. Hope you're feeling well today.

I have always thought of myself as a man who accepts what science tells me. That science is there to provide the facts whatever your gut instinct tells you otherwise. Scientists have the qualifications, they have the knowledge that I do not. My interests was in books or watching sporting physical activity than Physics.

Yet when it comes to the sediment from the Hinckley Point Nuclear Plant in Somerset coming to Cardiff Bay science suddenly loses to emotion. I become the person who will scream in protest despite what science tells me otherwise. Whether it is right or wrong does not matter. It's what you think inside that wins.

Hinckley Point is the site of a new nuclear power plant. Replacing the old one that is being disused. The sediment and mud from the disused plant that it's replacing is going to be disposed of a mile outside Cardiff Bay.

Now Science in the form of Natural Resources Wales who have done tests tells us not to worry. Perfectly acceptable results they will say. Now move along please.

Of course they may be right, no they are probably right....but...

Emotion tells me....no nags into me...something different.

What (emotion will ask me) if science is wrong? Or, as has been suggested, the tests are inadequate?

Then you would have the situation that radioactive waste has been dumped on Wales in the same way that criminals are being dumped on Port Talbot if the proposed super prison is built. This is the impression that's being given. Rubbish that Westminster does not want England to handle? Toss it over the Severn Bridge?

If the science is wrong/inadequate then you will have this dumped mud endangering the coastline not just of Cardiff but also nearby Barry Island and Porthcawl.

And what if the science is really wrong? What if there's a possibility that it endangers not just the environment but the lives of people as well? This is being dumped not in an isolated spot where there lives one man, his dog and a flock of sheep but near the capital city of Wales, Along  the coastline there are places such as the aforementioned Barry Island and Porthcawl where people come for breaks or days out by the sea.

Emotion tells me that this isn't right.

And if you tell me that I should just accept the science and shut up. I'd ask you this. Would you take the sediment where you live?

Bet you'd get emotional then.

Until the next time.











1 comment:

  1. Where's the science in this blog? More a naive faith in NRW. Cardiff Grounds has long served as a designated "disposal" site for dredged materials. Once the area was declared a European "Special Area of Conservation", a Habitats Regs assessment has been needed for dumping unusual dredgings, as for 'capital dredging' of Cardiff Bay linked to constructing the Cardiff Bay Barrage. So what happened over the capital dredging of Hinkley mud, when sampling showed several toxic metals are above Action Level-1 (a trigger level set by CEFAS scientists)? The CEFAS assessor said not to bother, toxic metals are rather high but not excessively so (when dumping is not allowed in any part of the sea). NRW are responsible for applying and enforcing the Habitats Regs, yet seemed to make no assessment of their own, from documents they supplied to a request for disclosure of all relevant documents they hold. Here we see the scientific process in practice - set limits, require assessment of wildlife impacts when the limit is exceeded, then don't bother to comply but suppress the information.In terms of radioactivity levels, CEFAS applied the IAEA methology for radiation does to humans; but omitted to mention in their 20017 report that the IAEA methodology changed in 2015 to include impacts on sensitive eco-organisms. The NRW regulator just ignored the IAEA's 2015 changes/additions. Perhaps NRW were not aware, as their acceptance of the CEFAS study without their own summary/commentary implies they lack a qualified specialist in radionuclides. In conclusion, if you believe in science, can you maintain faith in an NRW that fails to evidence their own assessments?

    ReplyDelete